Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 28, 2016, 04:17:19 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Check out the latest RPG news!
239052 Posts in 7105 Topics by 2358 Members
Latest Member: BeardyMcBeardface
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 141 142 [143] 144 145 ... 246
2131  Media / Single-Player RPGs / Re: Dragon Age Three (3) on: January 10, 2013, 01:26:39 PM
I've been a Bioware fan since Baldur's Gate, so I think I qualify as a "core fan". And I have never been on their forums, nor have I really desired to be on them.  That's a pretty skewed sample...
2132  Media / Single-Player RPGs / Re: Tales of Graces F on: January 09, 2013, 11:51:31 PM
I don't get these complaints.  This isn't like with Vesperia where we only got the version with less content (whether that content was really all that important is another question...).  We got the complete version of the game, so why do you want the incomplete version?  Not to mention that I've heard the Wii version had some serious bugs and never ran that well.

Symphonia was the best-selling Tales game in the US for a lot of reasons, mainly the total lack of other RPGs for the system (during a time when JRPGs were still pretty popular) and the fact that they had friggin Nintendo helping out with the marketing.  It's a bit silly to then conclude that Tales games would automatically sell better on Nintendo systems.
2133  Media / Anime, TV, and Movies / Re: Anime/Manga Journal on: January 09, 2013, 12:22:45 AM
Fushugi Yuugi

Fushigi Yuugi is soooooooo not shounen...
2134  Media / Anime, TV, and Movies / Re: Anime/Manga Journal on: January 08, 2013, 07:32:47 PM
Generally speaking, any manga published in a shounen magazine is classified as "shounen".  That's really where the distinction comes from, since different magazines are targeting different demographics.  Some shounen stuff can be fairly mature and well-written, like Death Note for instance.  Heck, Death Note was published in Jump of all things.

The distinction gets a little blurred in anime since television stations don't have the same sharp divide in demographics.
2135  Media / Anime, TV, and Movies / Re: Anime/Manga Journal on: January 08, 2013, 04:53:50 PM
In the interest of catching up on some "must see" stuff I'm finally going to watch steins gate after being rather dissapointed in chaos: head.... I say "must see" because I "must see" how freakin' convoluted and non-sensical this ends up being.... but hey, who knows... maybe I'll be presently surprised....

Don't even compare Chaos;Head and Steins;Gate.  Yes they're both based on visual novels but the same company, but the animes are worlds apart.  You will not be disappointed by Steins;Gate.

Unfortunately Steins;Gate may have been a one-hit wonder.  I've been watching Robotics;Note and it's pretty blah, though not as offensively bad as Chaos;Head at least.

I also enjoyed Bleach for the first couple seasons, but I long ago gave up on it.  It got so convoluted and dragged out.  But I don't know how much just the early episodes will help you with the game, Klyde.  I guess you'll be introduced to the basic characters, but Bleach isn't a game that sticks to one simple premise.  It kind of jumps all over the place...and not in a good way.

Mahou Sensei negima is awesome, but only in the manga format. They tried to animate many times and it sucked every single time (The OVAs are good though)

Oh man, I'll agree with that.  I actually watched the original anime first and thought it was awful.  A friend of mine tried to convince me to read the manga and I was like, "you've got to be kidding me".  I refused to even touch it.  But I did eventually start reading the manga...years later.  I was very impressed.  Despite the absurd premise and loads of fanservice, Negima is one of the best epic fantasy mangas I've ever read.
2136  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: RPGFan Games of the Year 2012 Discussion Thread on: January 08, 2013, 12:59:58 PM
Serious lack of Tales of Graces f on this list.  Definitely one of my favorites of the year. Should have been a shoo-in for best combat at the very least.  Sorry, but Mass Effect and Xenoblade don't even come close in that regard in my opinion.
2137  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: The NEW Game Journal on: January 06, 2013, 04:40:26 PM
The worst thing about trying to listen to the fanbase is that they never want anything new (they are, after all, fans of what came before...).  There would be zero innovation if developers actually listened to them.
2138  Media / Anime, TV, and Movies / Re: Anime/Manga Journal on: January 06, 2013, 12:50:38 PM
That might be a little on the high end, but not by much.  This shit is expensive in Japan.
2139  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Less than absolute zero??? on: January 05, 2013, 11:13:34 PM
In case there's anyone who doesn't want to read the paper (or can't, 'cause you need journal access...), here's a general news article that actually does a pretty decent job of explaining it:

2140  Media / Single-Player RPGs / Re: Atelier Ayesha on: January 05, 2013, 10:43:26 PM
We all told Klyde to skip Rorona but he just wouldn't listen...

Heck, even Gust is skipping it with their Vita re-releases.  They did Totori, are working on Meruru, but haven't said a peep about re-releasing Rorona.
2141  Media / Anime, TV, and Movies / Re: Anime/Manga Journal on: January 05, 2013, 10:39:16 PM
It's definitely more "inspired by" than based on, but there are a lot of Shakespeare references.

You know what I meant. >:(

Honestly I'd be really surprised if there was a manga or anime adaptation made within the last 5 years that's more based upon rather than "inspired by" like how pretty much every instance of the story Romance of the Three Kingdoms is at best "inspired by" verses actually based upon.

OK, but it's not inspired by any particular work by Shakespeare.  There are some pretty obvious allusions to The Tempest but there are also references to Hamlet and other works.  It's not cribbing the plot from any one source is what I meant.  Saying "based on" would really be pushing it.

BTW, I tried reading the original Romance of the Three Kingdoms once (well, a translated version but a pretty literal one), and it is dry as heck.  I couldn't get through it.  Half the book is just like a list of battles and people who fought in them (person A defeated person B then person C defeated person D and on and on and on...).  Turns out literature actually has advanced since then...

Oh yeah, Mickeymac's question.  I don't actually know what you've seen already, but in terms of short-but-good series a couple that come to mind are Kokoro Connect and Another.  Kind of on opposite ends of the spectrum, though.
2142  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Less than absolute zero??? on: January 05, 2013, 07:45:49 PM
It's 'hotter' because when temperature goes negative the probability distribution is actually emphasizes high-energy states over low-energy states (which is why an upper bound energy is so important, because otherwise the probability distribution would just explode to infinity).  So no, there aren't more particles in the ground state.  At absolute zero all particles would be in the ground state, but if you keep going 'down' in temperature you start having particles in excited states again, but now with a totally different shape to the probability distribution than a positive temperature.
2143  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Less than absolute zero??? on: January 05, 2013, 04:32:51 PM
It might be better to think about energy rather than temperature for a moment.  Temperature is a parameter which describes a statistical distribution of energies.  It only has meaning in an ensemble.  Energy is a bit more universal and more easily understood.

In a system at absolute zero, every single particle is in its ground state.  That means the energy of the system is the smallest it can possibly be (that's kind of the definition of a ground state).  So there is no way for energy to decrease from the absolute zero system without introducing some sort of exotic (and completely hypothetical at this point) negative energy or something (which I guess is what the author of the original link thought was happening here...).  That's why absolute zero is typically viewed as an absolute limit.

But that's in terms of energy, not temperature.  Again, temperature is a parameter that describes a statistical distribution.  In turns out that for some distributions, it is possible to have a well-defined system in which that parameter is negative.  The shape of the statistical distribution is quite different from a positive temperature, but make no mistake here:  there is no question that the "negative temperature" system has more energy than at absolute zero.  The distribution is different, but there are still particles not in their ground state, and nothing has somehow gone below ground state energy.

So is this just semantics?  A funny definition of temperature?  Well, it's not quite that simple.  You might ask why the shape of the energy distribution is so important in the first place.  Certainly it is possible to artificially construct a system with a different energy distribution, but such a system is not stable.  It's not in equilibrium.  Turns out that the mathematics behind temperature are quite universal, and given enough time to reach equilibrium all systems will eventually reach a thermal distribution.  So it really is a special distribution.

So here is a system that's stable and just happens to be described by a thermal distribution with a negative temperature.  It's very hard to think that's just a coincidence, thus describing this system as having negative temperature isn't unreasonable.  But it probably differs from people's intuition about temperature quite a bit.
2144  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Less than absolute zero??? on: January 05, 2013, 02:49:47 PM
So I read the actual paper and now I want to smack the author of that link silly.  He wrote, "For example, while atoms are usually pulled downward by gravity, those below absolute zero float upwards instead."

There is no mention of anything of the sort in the actual paper.  This is complete fiction.

So what do they actually mean by negative temperature?  The definition they are using for temperature is that the probability of being in a state i with energy E_i is proportional to exp(-E_i / (k_B * T)), where k_B is Boltzmann’s constant.  You might note that since we're talking about discrete energy states this is an inherently quantum mechanical definition, but the idea is simply that there is a decaying exponential distribution that favors lower energy states.  So what if T goes negative?  Well, it's not a decaying exponential anymore, and for that to make any sense you need a system will a well-defined upper bound energy, which the paper spends a while talking about.

But is this "negative temperature" distribution the same as being cold?  Actually, no.  The paper even says, "...emphasizing that negative temperature states are hotter than positive temperature states, i.e., in thermal contact, heat would flow from a negative to a positive temperature system."

So is this just semantics?  Maybe in some sense.  It's interesting because the negative temperature state is actually stable (under the right conditions), not some rapidly-decaying pseudo-state.  They mention some potential applications in the paper, but this isn't anything that's going to change the world.  But I guess that's less exciting than antigravity...
2145  Media / Anime, TV, and Movies / Re: Anime/Manga Journal on: January 04, 2013, 11:30:02 PM
It's definitely more "inspired by" than based on, but there are a lot of Shakespeare references.
Pages: 1 ... 141 142 [143] 144 145 ... 246

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!