If I wanted to direct hate at him, I'd have already done so. Not my fault you and others easily misconstrue things I post on these internets. Are you insinuating the rest of my post has no validity? The rest of the posts here would suggest otherwise sir.
The rest of your posts definitely have validity, at least in my eyes, which is exactly why I said "what are you talking about?" in reference to Logick. He made a post with a few fairly incontroversial statements, then you argued it, and THEN you accused him of using two-faced bullshit. In my last post I asked where and when, and how that's at all relevant to the one post he made in this thread. You didn't answer me, but instead decided to talk about how I come across:
Hey, don't you know who I am, I am a moderator on a popular internet message forum.
That's seriously what you sound like dude, don't play that card with me.
If that's what I sound like, so be it. I will gladly play that card, and in fact, I'll play it again. If you accuse people of "two-faced bullshit" in a thread when they've done no such thing, and THEN tell me I'm acting high and mighty as a mod rather than explain yourself (which is what I asked you to do in the first place)...well yeah, I think I'm free to criticize you and flex whatever muscles I have.
But I have a rather profound respect for you and the things you say, so I just wanted you to explain yourself. Maybe there was something I missed and you could spell it out. I still don't see how "two-faced bullshit" relates to Logick's one post in this thread, but if you can help me connect the dots, then that's that. If not, please refrain from talking like that, k?