Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 24, 2014, 10:52:48 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
RPGFan Community Quiz!
Persona 3 FES Quiz is now OVER!
Winner was user: Monsoon!
334759 Posts in 13709 Topics by 2200 Members
Latest Member: Rgeneb1
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 135 136 [137] 138 139 ... 190
2041  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: What's the haps? on: October 09, 2010, 10:02:30 AM
Climbed a mountain and saw three waterfalls in the Sumatran rainforest yesterday. Good times.
With this, you win the thread.
pics?
2042  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Super RPGFan Game Journal IV - The New Warriors: The Revenge The Movie The Game on: October 08, 2010, 10:03:47 AM
Other M - I fought the super secret boss
Code:
Ridley!
in the vicinity of 20 times. It just moves so damn fast that it took me awhile to figure it all out. I finally beat it, and am now...um...somewhere else.

I like this game, but damn do I want to play LoS. 19 days til my birthday. I'll be alright.


2043  Media / Single-Player RPGs / Re: Why isn't the DS getting more RPGs on: October 08, 2010, 09:49:53 AM
you all are ripping on my main guy Thoren. Is this just?

...huh?
I don't even think he's been mentioned a good number of posts.
Aside from touching himself - but I believe we're all liable to that, and therefore, if Prime is correct, we are all responsible for lack of RPGs on any console.

...and dead kittens.
; - )
2044  Media / Single-Player RPGs / Re: Alundra and Arc the Lad coming to PSN on 10.12.2010 on: October 08, 2010, 09:46:00 AM
I played Alundra briefly back when it came out. I don't remember why, but it didn't work for me.
I've always wanted to play the Arc games. Hmmm...
2045  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Pat's editorial - I Don't Have The Patience For This! (Anymore) on: October 07, 2010, 06:57:32 PM
I played it when it came out on the SNES.  That shouldn't be unusual, I think it sold pretty well.  And I've always seen emulators as a pretty fringe thing.
Same here. I really don't get the emulator comment. I thought pretty much everyone who wanted to play it, played it on the SNES. Then there was the PS release. Then the more recent DS release. Interesting.
Terranigma, on the other hand...
2046  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Super RPGFan Game Journal IV - The New Warriors: The Revenge The Movie The Game on: October 07, 2010, 09:29:11 AM
Other M:
I made it to this totally top secret boss type creature that you would never guess would be in a Metroid game.
Code:
Ridley!
I fought it 5 or 6 times, getting my ass kicked handily each time. Ouch.


2047  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Pat's editorial - I Don't Have The Patience For This! (Anymore) on: October 06, 2010, 05:15:56 PM
That's one thing I like about the PSP- I can hook it up to my HDTV and play on the big screen. 
Which means I HAVE to get one to play all the damn Ys games coming out! augh!
2048  Media / Miscellaneous Games / Re: Finished Games. on: October 06, 2010, 01:35:02 PM
I suffer from a severe case of collectoritis.  I don't sell or trade in anything.  I even keep games I hated...

Way back in the day when I was much younger and strapped for cash I sold some of my Super Nintendo games (some really good ones, like Final Fantasy III and Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past) and I have never forgiven myself.  Seriously, it haunts me to this day.
Same here. I don't sell/trade anything. Just like you, I sold a few games back in the day(Panzer Dragoon Saga!) that I now regret selling.
2049  Media / The Soundroom / Re: Retro VGM that you love. on: October 06, 2010, 09:57:12 AM
This is such a wide open topic. How do we define "retro"? Anything from the Gen/SNES era or before? earlier than that?
Personally, I think NES/GB/old computer games, etc. = retro. Old school chip tunes.
Regardless, I agree on the greatness of The Genesis stuff posted. Moon Beach is also one of my favs. The PS games had great music. Thunderforce III & IVs(the ones I played) synthesized rock was amazing.

As for my contributions:
Shadowgate for the NES:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94Tsezcm8yA
I agree with Chronix about Chip and Dale. That game had some great tunes!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMPSKuRKSec&feature=related
Gameboy Castlevania Adventure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLyg6wG4CWY
2050  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Super RPGFan Game Journal IV - The New Warriors: The Revenge The Movie The Game on: October 06, 2010, 09:25:32 AM
I'm jealous, Mr. D. I asked my wife to get it for me for my birthday, which is the 27th.
I'm enjoying Other M, though, so it's not really a problem.
2051  Media / The Soundroom / Re: Xenogears is finally getting the orchestral treatment on: October 06, 2010, 09:22:50 AM
Yeah, he posted this on his FB page this morning. I still listen to, and love, the original soundtrack. I'm not sure the orchestral treatment will make the music better than it already is, but it should still be awesome.
2052  Media / Single-Player RPGs / Re: Best RPG of the decade on: October 06, 2010, 09:06:12 AM
Exactly, Hathen. That list is mostly awful, but I understand how it came about. My own list would be quite different.
Now that could be fun...
I have absolutely no idea what my #1 game of all time is, let alone my top 25.

2053  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Pat's editorial - I Don't Have The Patience For This! (Anymore) on: October 05, 2010, 09:51:33 AM
I say if an RPG is going to be in the 10-20 hour ballpark, it should have some replay value.  When I'm paying good money for a game, I want it to last a while, and RPGs are good in that regard.  Granted, some RPGs like Last Rebellion feel very cumbersome and long despite being 15-16 hours long whereas any given Persona title feels fresh well after the 50 hour mark where I'm saying, "zuh?!?!?!  I played this for 50 hours already?!?!?!  It only feels like 50 minutes!" 
You people and your replay value. I barely have time to play a game once, let alone replay it! Replay value means nothing to me.

Still, I love my RPGs.  Action games might have the virtue of being more finishable (is that a word...) and there are certainly a few action titles that I have enjoyed, but for the most part I really can't get into them the same way I do with RPGs.  It's more the style of play than anything.  Even when I was a kid I wasn't much of a twitch gamer and that's even more true now.  I like a slower paced, thoughtful experience like you find in turn-based games, though of course even in RPGs turn-based has become the exception instead of the rule.
I still love rpgs, too. In no way am I a twitch gamer. All these action games that I play nowadays, I have to play on easy mode or GTFO. I like the quick thrill I get from playing GoW or Gears or Bayonetta. But I also miss playing long, epic rpgs. It's almost like a chapter of my life ended, and I had to either turn the page, or close the book entirely.
Yeah, I'm playing Tales of Vesperia right now, past the 20 hour mark, and I was disappointed to find out that it takes maybe 40 to 60 hours to beat it. Sadly the first thing I thought of upon finding this out is "Fuck what have I gotten myself into?! Shoulda picked a shorter RPG to play..."
Same here. I started playing it, then read about how long it is. I stopped shortly thereafter.
subway/train/flight commuters are at a HUGE advantage for game time w/ handhelds. I'm mad jealous of that aspect of "urban / corporate" life.

Thanks everyone for the input.

YS: THE OATH IN FELGHANA for PSP should satisfy many of us with limited time. It's like 8-10 hours and awesome every step of the way.
I want these damn Ys games so bad, but can't get myself to buy a psp. I have a DS and never use it. I simply prefer the console experience over the handheld. Plus, it hurts my neck to play the damn thing. Like you, Pat, I'm kinda jealous of those who can play a handheld outside of the home.
Ah, but here's the rub:

If you guys are anything like me, I'm not just an avid gamer, I'm an avid reader, and I expect the same quality tales from the books I read as the games I play. This does put games at a supreme disadvantage. A 30 hour read is pure story element, while a 30 hour RPG must sacrifice in order to present a game. While descriptions in in any video format are presented instantly, saving time, I don't feel that can compare with extra dialogue, character develpoment, and insight that a book format can supply in full.

What do you think? Can an RPG with the same limitations required to make it more easily digestable still present a quality story? is the sacrifice worth it? What about breaking things into episodes? Say, 3, 20 hour downloadable chunks at 20 bucks a pop instead od a single, massive 60 hour game?
Huh? This is an odd argument. Books and games are too different. Still, it DOES take me forever to get through a single book. Just like for gaming, my time for reading is limited. A half hour a day means an average book can take me a month or two to get through.
2054  The Rest / General Discussions / Pat's editorial - I Don't Have The Patience For This! (Anymore) on: October 04, 2010, 03:51:57 PM
I'm surprised no one has wanted to chat about this. Go read it if you haven't yet:
http://www.rpgfan.com/news/2010/516.html
I can relate to a lot of what he talks about. I even mention it in my latest game journal entry, although it’s more in regards to ALL games, not just rpgs.
I am one of those “older” gamers(35 is old, right?) that has a wife, a kid, a house, and all the(time sucking) stuff that comes along with such things.  I still enjoy gaming immensely, but have found myself playing rpgs less and less, due to the overall time commitment.  I only partially agree with his comments on gaming sessions.  It’s true that I need a game that I can play in small chunks, and still feel like I accomplished something. I’m currently playing Other M, and it is actually pretty good about this.  I also know that the game is only supposed to last around 10 hours, which means I’ll get the “I beat a game” feeling a hell of a lot sooner than if I were playing a 35 hour(on the low end) rpg.
This is probably why I have all but abandoned rpgs. They just take too damn long to play through.  It’s the #1 reason why I have not invested much time in FFXIII. It’s supposed to be a 60+ hour game. You have any idea how LONG it would take me to play through such a monster?  If I were able to squeeze in an hour 3 nights a week, it would take me 20 weeks! That’s 5 friggin’ months. I can play 5-6 10 hour action/adventure games in that same time frame.
There are always exceptions. I loved ME2 and played that as often as possible, resulting in a 45 hour game being beaten +/- 2 months.  That’s still a long time compared to all sorts of gamers who seem to have the time to beat new games in a matter of days.
“Skip to the END!”
If more developers could just squeeze the rpg experience down into a more “reasonable” time requirement, I might be more willing to give their games a try. What is reasonable? For me, it is 20-30hours. There's no reason a good narrative can't be told in such a time frame. All sorts of games in other genres are doing it just fine. For now, though, A lot of rpgs will get a pass based solely on the amount of time required to beat it. Sad, but true.
2055  The Rest / General Discussions / Re: Super RPGFan Game Journal IV - The New Warriors: The Revenge The Movie The Game on: October 04, 2010, 03:10:51 PM
Still playing Other M. I wish I had a large chunk of time to play this(or any game, I suppose), but it just doesn't happen. I pretty much play from one save point to the next, then turn it off for the night.
Anyway, I just got the grapple beam. Time to do some swinging. And perhaps some grappling when I'm done with that.
; - )
Pages: 1 ... 135 136 [137] 138 139 ... 190


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!