"Its awkwardness is meant to suggest the capacity of adaptation brought by the modularity of the medium we use that voids any application of definition of specificity to the spaces the works co-habit â€”and therefore plasticises part of the way the work is read by the viewer."
I hate when people write like that:
The medium of the "art" lacks specificity and is modular in nature, plasticiZing (or changing ) the way the piece of shit is interpreted.
Is sort of my take
A piece that is awkward because of the way it adapts to its surroundings in such a manner that it is pointless to apply concrete definition, changing the way people interpret pieces.