"Its awkwardness is meant to suggest the capacity of adaptation brought by the modularity of the medium we use that voids any application of definition of specificity to the spaces the works co-habit â€”and therefore plasticises part of the way the work is read by the viewer."
I hate when people write like that:
The medium of the "art" lacks specificity and is modular in nature, plasticiZing (or changing ) the way the piece of shit is interpreted.
Is sort of my take
That's about the gist of what my mum and I could piece together after a few slow re-readings heh.
We think we also understood that it was hard to really finalize any sort of "end-meaning", I think (I may be off)
(Yeah, I hate these assholes that write like this.... why? why why why why why???)