Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 22, 2014, 12:26:49 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
RPGFan Community Quiz!
Subject: Persona 3: FES
Prize: $20 eShop, PSN or Steam code
Date: 3rd October 2014 Time: 16:00 EST
331894 Posts in 13590 Topics by 2191 Members
Latest Member: Zaltys
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  RPGFan Message Boards
|-+  Media
| |-+  Multiplayer RPGs
| | |-+  Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Benchmark Results Thread
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Author Topic: Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Benchmark Results Thread  (Read 11044 times)
Embryon
RPGFan Editor
Posts: 2835


Achieve enlightenment.

Member
*


View Profile WWW
« on: February 21, 2013, 02:40:04 PM »

How well did you guys do on the FFXIV: ARR benchmark? Check out our news story here, download the program, and post your scores here!

I managed 3813 on High. My computer is pretty powerful, but I'm sure others can do much better.
Logged



"Man up and take your handjob." - dyeager
Tenchi-no-Ryu
RPGFan's MMO Junkie
Posts: 1355


Member
*

TenchiNoRyujin
View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2013, 03:34:42 PM »

Separate thread? Makes sense for topic. Here's my results. You can check the actual FPS by choosing the "Save" your score, the resultant text file has all the specific data about your performance.



59.5 FPS on both settings 1680x1050







49.7 FPS, 36.2 FPS respectively on 1920x1200



Running an i7 2600 3.4Ghz, 8GB DDR3, GTX 560Ti Hawk. Honestly speaking there's almost no loss of fidelity going from Max to High settings. Extremely scalable engine is awesome for low to mid end PCs. One of my friends hit 10,000+ on a GTX 680. I think anyone with a PC that was bought within the last 3-4 years can run the game quite well.
Logged
Ashton
Contributing Editor
Posts: 5085


Lawful Asshole

Member
*


View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2013, 04:00:01 PM »

I got a 2869 and 2335 on Hihg and Maximum, respectively.

It's surprising, since the original FFXIV benchmark ran like shit on my coputer (it said it wouldn't run on high settings). I am happy with this. What's with the resolutions, though? No 1080p? WTF.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2013, 04:03:22 PM by Ashton » Logged

Tenchi-no-Ryu
RPGFan's MMO Junkie
Posts: 1355


Member
*

TenchiNoRyujin
View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2013, 04:08:41 PM »

There's 1440x1080 ;p

I'm kind of disappointed they didn't give you a fullscreen option with more resolution settings so you could have a more real-world estimation of performance. Still, I did a system reboot and shutdown some of my background programs and it increased the score by 150-300 points depending on the test, so the benchmark has a higher degree of precision than the old one. I did notice that there actually is some significant changes in natural lighting between high and max settings, most noticeably in the Gridania ride through - on High it looks like late afternoon, on Max it's morning on a VERY sunny day. There's also no lens flares on high. J.J. Abrams is sad :(
Logged
Ashton
Contributing Editor
Posts: 5085


Lawful Asshole

Member
*


View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2013, 04:12:39 PM »

Well I kind of wanted to test it on my 1920 x 1080 screen, but I guess the 1680 x 1050 will suffice for now.

And yeah, I noticed that lighting difference. Might just play on Max and take the FPS hit...
Logged

Tsi Aileron
Posts: 116


Member
*

113308759 TsiAileron@hotmail.com Tsi+Aileron TsiAileron
View Profile WWW Email

Ignore
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2013, 04:33:10 PM »



My average FPS was 38 on maximum and 49.616 on high.

Windows 8 Pro
Core i5-3570k @ 4.5GHz
16GBs of DDR3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Edit: 1080p is the 3rd option down.

Edit 2: So I took it down from 1080p to the next 16:9 resolution, 1600x900. My score jumped to 6002 on maximum but it only gave me one extra FPS on average. High is another story though. My score went up to a 7846 and I had an average FPS of 64.828.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2013, 05:30:19 PM by Tsi Aileron » Logged

Akanbe-
Posts: 2753


Cheap? I paid a lot for this hat!

Member
*

----- 4237981
View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2013, 05:39:17 PM »

Logged


"Karma is...secret top tier"~Starmongoose
PSN ID: Akanbe9
Datastorm
Posts: 141


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2013, 06:51:46 PM »

Hello

Decided to go ahead and run the benchmark at 1600x900 as this is the opt resolution for my monitors and what I'll be playing the game at anyway. The test was done on a homebuilt system, ran beautifully, from some of the other scores on lodestone and such looks like I could get alot higher if I oc'd the processor. I don't really see the point since its running fine as is so will probably not oc...





FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/21/2013 4:43:55 PM
Score:6770
Average Framerate:55.491
Performance:Very High
 -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1600x900
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled
-Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Display : All
-Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels
-Shadow Cascading : High
-Shadow Softening : High
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : High
-Anisotropic Filtering : High
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Effects While in Motion : Display All
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled

System:
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
8138.902MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti  (VRAM 4050 MB) 9.18.0013.0697
Logged

doh
Embryon
RPGFan Editor
Posts: 2835


Achieve enlightenment.

Member
*


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2013, 08:06:09 PM »

Wow, my score is pretty pitiful compared to all of yours! Haha. I tried running it again on Maximum and got 3252 on 1680x1050 resolution. For what it's worth, the framerate is steady, and I didn't get any skipping whatsoever. I'm satisfied.
Logged



"Man up and take your handjob." - dyeager
Dade
Rainbow Club Member
Posts: 1556


D-Rider's Pacific NW Counterpart

Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2013, 09:46:10 PM »

Got a 4754 running 1920x1080 at High.

I'm good with this.

I'm jealous of everyone who is getting in the beta on Monday. Derek, I expect live tweeting while I'm at work.
Logged

Twitter: (at)toddjaynes
XBL: ToddJameson
PSN: toddjameson
Steam: DadeMcLaren

Playing: ACIV: Black Flag (surprisingly awesome!), XCOM: Enemy Within, The Last of Us (finally).
"Resident Evil 6 is a Michael Bay movie." ~Jim Sterling
Parn
Posts: 2345


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2013, 10:15:59 PM »



Not too bad on my mac, especially since it was checking for and downloading updates for windows 7 while I was running it.
Logged
Datastorm
Posts: 141


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2013, 10:41:27 PM »

Heres a spreadsheet of a bunch of the test scores:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnFkM1_JharvdGlIc0dwMmcyWDVoR1gzTGp2UlJUVmc&usp=sharing#gid=0
Logged

doh
Soviet
Posts: 7

Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2013, 02:07:24 AM »

8014 at 1920x1200 on Max settings. Consoles really have ruined any point of having super powerful PC parts. I've got a single 680GTX, not even running the new Titan. PS4 can't get here soon enough.
Logged
Embryon
RPGFan Editor
Posts: 2835


Achieve enlightenment.

Member
*


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2013, 02:48:02 AM »

Got a 4754 running 1920x1080 at High.

I'm good with this.

I'm jealous of everyone who is getting in the beta on Monday. Derek, I expect live tweeting while I'm at work.

Dat NDA, br0. I wish I could.
Logged



"Man up and take your handjob." - dyeager
Solstafir
Posts: 97

Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2013, 03:11:09 AM »

5749 and 46.641 average FPS on High at 1680x1050. I want to see what killing shadows a bit will do to this.

5929 and 48.034 average FPS after lowering a few shadow settings and grass quality... not really much difference, haha.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2013, 03:22:44 AM by Solstafir » Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!