Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 10, 2015, 02:21:56 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Check out the latest RPG news!
367679 Posts in 14851 Topics by 2312 Members
Latest Member: Godofelru
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  RPGFan Message Boards
|-+  The Rest
| |-+  General Discussions
| | |-+  Judge Embeds the Smithy Code in Copyright Ruling
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Judge Embeds the Smithy Code in Copyright Ruling  (Read 1536 times)
Rainbow Club Member
Posts: 1556

D-Rider's Pacific NW Counterpart


View Profile

« on: April 27, 2006, 10:53:21 AM »


For those not in the know.....Dan Brown, author of the DaVinci Code, and his publisher were sued for copyright infringement by two of the three authors of some nonfiction work written in the 80s.

Suit goes to trial....and the judge hands down this ruling with his own code in it. HILARIOUS.

Personally, after making snide remarks throughout the trial about both parties' works and about the parties' themselves.....i think this was a final "HAHA MORONS" for this judge.

He won't talk anymore about his ruling until he retires, but that's probably not far off since he's not really a young man anymore.

Funny read for DaVinci Code Fans.

Twitter: (at)toddjaynes
XBL: ToddJameson
PSN: toddjameson
Steam: DadeMcLaren

Playing: ACIV: Black Flag (surprisingly awesome!), XCOM: Enemy Within, The Last of Us (finally).
"Resident Evil 6 is a Michael Bay movie." ~Jim Sterling
Dios GX
Posts: 892


dios@hidoshi.com GSaviourPrime
View Profile

« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2006, 11:07:19 AM »

Did you know if you read the da vinci code backwards it says "This book is fucking full of shit and really gay LOL CONTROVERSY".

It does, seriously.
Posts: 568


View Profile

« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2006, 03:08:01 PM »

It's fiction, who gives a crap? :P

Let me know when some controvery's stirred up over something real. A guy putting wacky ideas in a book and selling it to the people, that's just business. If he were trying to put this book forward as NON-fiction, then maybe it'd be worth arguing about.

Otherwise, it's just two sides bickering over a book, and we've got plenty of books people bicker about already.

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!