Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 17, 2014, 12:11:07 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
RPGFan Community Quiz
Next Quiz Date: January 11, 2014
Subject: 999 (Nintendo DS)
For more information click HERE!
318968 Posts in 13029 Topics by 2145 Members
Latest Member: aew0
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  RPGFan Message Boards
|-+  Media
| |-+  Single-Player RPGs
| | |-+  Fantasy RPGs?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print
Author Topic: Fantasy RPGs?  (Read 8674 times)
Eusis
Administrator
Posts: 11769


Member
*


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: March 04, 2009, 02:05:09 AM »

I'm not really sure what your point is, but you either misunderstood me or I screwed up in communicating (I did screw up and said "can" when I meant "can't"), but what I meant is that I'd find it interesting to play in a setting where magic simply doesn't exist, and there isn't an alternative that serves the same exact purpose. The Fallout titles managed it, so it's certainly possible, but may not work as well with JRPG design without being changed to barely fall under the genre. Anyways, this applies more towards modern and sci-fi settings than fantasy, though having fantasy settings with low or no magic can be interesting. Especially if your characters are not, in fact, the lucky ones with access to it.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2009, 02:25:38 AM by Eusis » Logged
Aeolus
I'm not evil!
Posts: 5792


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #46 on: March 04, 2009, 02:53:05 AM »

.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2010, 05:45:39 PM by KillerArmoire » Logged

You've misunderstood me. I just seek your death only because you're in the way of my goal of world conquest. I can't help it that I have evil ambitions and am named Dark Lord. Honest.
magusgs
Resident Otaku
Posts: 228


Member
*


View Profile Email

Ignore
« Reply #47 on: March 04, 2009, 08:17:32 AM »

Hah, I never said the D&D magic system was efficient.  It has complexity and depth, but it has a huge learning curve and it's difficult to use on the fly.  Since you want a game that's limited to a handful of "useful" spells, you're obviously aiming in the opposite direction from me.
Logged

The content of this post represents solely the opinion of the user, and is not guaranteed for accuracy, completeness, or usefulness.  Any facts potentially contained therein may have little or no basis in reality.  RPGFan shall not be held liable for fits of aggression or disgust inspired by the contents of this post.  Read at your own risk.
MeshGearFox
Posts: 8136


HERE ON RUM ISLAND WE DO NOT BELIEVE IN RUM!

Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #48 on: March 05, 2009, 03:25:30 AM »

Speaking of efficiency... none of the stats in SD2 apparently did anything, and the gameplay didn't suffer at all. Which makes me think that that was the intended design and the stats screen was something they forgot to remove.

In general I don't think more stats == more depth, or more skills == more depth. Especially in regards to skills, I only want them if they're tied to letting the player do something new. Lots of wholly passive skills are boring.
Logged

o/` I do not feel joy o/`
o/` I do not dream o/`
o/` I only stare at the door and smoke o/`

magusgs
Resident Otaku
Posts: 228


Member
*


View Profile Email

Ignore
« Reply #49 on: March 05, 2009, 08:14:42 AM »

I find myself attracted to stat-heavy games, and I usually go for the passive skills first when I have a choice.  It's probably the joy of decrypting the system and figuring out which skills are best.  It's somewhat less enjoyable when the effects are hidden or overly complex, i.e., most Final Fantasy games.  I like it best when I can sit down, run numbers through my head, and figure out what's best in a given situation without having to consult an online guide.
Logged

The content of this post represents solely the opinion of the user, and is not guaranteed for accuracy, completeness, or usefulness.  Any facts potentially contained therein may have little or no basis in reality.  RPGFan shall not be held liable for fits of aggression or disgust inspired by the contents of this post.  Read at your own risk.
Aeolus
I'm not evil!
Posts: 5792


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #50 on: March 05, 2009, 04:25:53 PM »

.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2010, 05:45:29 PM by KillerArmoire » Logged

You've misunderstood me. I just seek your death only because you're in the way of my goal of world conquest. I can't help it that I have evil ambitions and am named Dark Lord. Honest.
MeshGearFox
Posts: 8136


HERE ON RUM ISLAND WE DO NOT BELIEVE IN RUM!

Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #51 on: March 06, 2009, 10:12:10 AM »

SMT:N was actually pretty good about that, in regards to cost v. effectiveness. I mean, in regards to your main dude, switching from agi to like, agilao eventually is probably a good idea just because of limited spell slots, but you'll usually want to keep both the single and multiple hit form of a spell around at the same time for MP management.

Although that game was built entirely around elemental weaknesses really.
Logged

o/` I do not feel joy o/`
o/` I do not dream o/`
o/` I only stare at the door and smoke o/`

Edmond3
Posts: 5

Member
*


View Profile Email

Ignore
« Reply #52 on: April 05, 2009, 12:35:45 AM »

just fyi, skies of arcadia rules

so thanks for that, everyone
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!