News Reviews Previews Pictures RPGFan Music Podcast Forums Features About

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2013, 08:55:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
"Thumpa-thumpa, yo! Sacrificial, beneficial, nothing here is artificial! Undefiled, unbeguiled, please accept this virgin child! Thumpa-thumpa yo!"
276607 Posts in 11805 Topics by 1977 Members
Latest Member: Syn
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  RPGFan Message Boards
|-+  Media
| |-+  Miscellaneous Games
| | |-+  Namco Vs Capcom? Capcom Vs Namco???		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Namco Vs Capcom? Capcom Vs Namco???  (Read 1727 times)
Danku
Posts: 253


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2010, 03:50:24 PM »
Breath of Fire had no memorable or popular characters, so it makes sense to not add them into a game.
Logged
Fadedsun
Posts: 1572


Sunny Summoner

Member
*

illogicaldreamr
View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2010, 03:52:14 PM »
Quote from: Danku on July 26, 2010, 03:50:24 PM
Breath of Fire had no memorable or popular characters, so it makes sense to not add them into a game.

I'm just going to pretend you didn't say that.
Logged
"Observe! My eating lunch pose!"
Gen Eric Gui
Posts: 2302


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #17 on: July 26, 2010, 03:58:54 PM »
Katt and Fou-Lu would like to have a word with you about that.
Logged
Danku
Posts: 253


Member
*


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2010, 12:57:27 AM »
Forgot to put /sarcasm... don't hurt me!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!